Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 15, 2025, 7:41 pm
Atheist Forums › Science › Physical Sciences v
Shroud of Turin more legit after research?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
Silver Offline Donators
Faith's Nightmare
*****
Religious Views: Infidel Savant
Posts: 34008
Threads: 1429
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation: 152
#27
RE: Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
April 8, 2018 at 8:25 pm (This post was last modified: April 8, 2018 at 9:16 pm by Silver.)
(April 8, 2018 at 8:23 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(April 7, 2018 at 8:53 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: The best explanation to date is that the Shroud is a painting, not a burial cloth, and dates from the Middle Ages, not the 1st century.  No burst of ultraviolet light required.

Boru

You obviously don't know much about painting.

Neither do you, apparently.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Physical Sciences v
Shroud of Turin more legit after research?

Messages In This Thread
RE: Shroud of Turin more legit after research? - by Silver - April 8, 2018 at 8:25 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bombardier Challenger 604 'totaled' after A380 wake turbulence event vorlon13 1 875 June 14, 2017 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Dr. Graham Phillips research on meditation Little Rik 3 1180 June 12, 2016 at 6:15 am
Last Post: Lucanus
  Who the hell believes this is a legit study I ask? Mystical 6 1796 May 7, 2014 at 3:09 am
Last Post: Justtristo
  Research shows radiometric dating still reliable (again) orogenicman 7 3632 November 16, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)