Shroud of Turin more legit after research?

[Rev. Rye]

many of the attributes are equivalent in the bible

I take it you didn't actually read my first post where I pointed out that the simple fact that we can see Jesus' face on the Shroud actually runs counter to the Gospel of John

6 Then Simon Peter came up, following him, and went into the tomb and saw the linen wrappings [neatly] lying there; 7 and the [burial] [a]face-cloth which had been on Jesus’ head, not lying with the [other] linen wrappings, but [b]rolled up in a place by itself.

Once again, the Gospel of John itself states that the burial shroud DID NOT COVER his head, and therefore, that face should not even be on the Shroud, if it's genuine. Or maybe John the Evangelist got his information wrong...

And rather amusingly, there is a cloth claimed to be the facecloth that covered Jesus, the Sudarium of Oviedo, and it has a longer documented history than the Shroud of Turin, by about 800 years.

Also, Jewish burial custom demanded that bodies be cleaned of blood before being wrapped in their shrouds. There should not be blood on the Shroud. The fact that you're even claiming there is and it proves that it's real shows you have no idea what the fuck you're even talking about.