RE: Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
April 9, 2018 at 3:46 am
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2018 at 3:47 am by Succubus.)
(April 8, 2018 at 7:44 pm)orthodox-man Wrote: Apparently though the carbon dating was flawed because they took a piece of the cloth that wasn't an original piece of cloth, and many of the attributes are equivalent in the bible
The worlds top textile experts were dragged in as the sample was taken, for just that reason. The sample was not from a patched area. And before you claim invisible mending or other such bollocks, no, invisible mending is impossible even today, it will always show up under a microscope.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
