(April 22, 2018 at 10:46 pm)Hammy Wrote:(April 22, 2018 at 10:43 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: What I have come to realize, is that in these discussions, you have to be aware that others may be meaning something different than what we may be thinking. For instance, in the voting machine analogy. If the person goes into the voting booth machine, and makes their choice, we would say that they had a free will choice to do so. If however you found that in actuality, the machine was tampered with, and the voter could not have chose otherwise, then it is not free will. I would say that he still made a free decision, and that the completely external information, that there really wasn’t a choice, does not change a thing as far as free will.
Despite the fact that even his own motives were ultimately predetermined by prior causes that he had no control over lol.
Then you are getting rid of “will” all together; free or otherwise. Likely also getting rid of conscienceness and reason. In which case, you didn’t come to this conclusion through reason.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther