(April 23, 2018 at 12:01 am)Khemikal Wrote: It seems like there was. You couldn't choose b, for example...of a total two "options" a and b, you could only choose a.
It's not about an unwillingness to choose. Stop using that semantic crap.
It's merely about having chosen one over another, because in the end choice is directly tied to free will. So long as you have the option of choosing one over another, your free will is intact.
You're unnecessarily twisting the argument backward for your own benefit, and it is unbecoming at this point.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
~ Erin Hunter