(April 22, 2018 at 11:02 pm)Hammy Wrote:If you're really serious/interested in the game, you should look into what people are doing in no limit poker now. You're still using no limit strategy from like 2006.Quote:Regarding Poker and Game Theory, math plays so heavily into those things.
True, but I play no limit texas hold em. And it's more about implied odds and reverse implied odds than calculating specific odds. You have to guess how much you think you will be able to make or how much you think you will lose, on future streets, so.... in many cases the actual explicit odds are nowhere near good enough, but you know your opponents will pay you off later because they suck ass so you can get away with drawing for a big hand anyway. And in other cases, you know that you've got a hand that is either going to win a small pot or lose a big one, so you have reverse-implied odds... even if the explicit odds are good.
I can't do Omaha because i suck at math and it's a lot more mathy.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 25, 2025, 9:03 pm
Thread Rating:
Theists: Hitchens Wager
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Pascal's Wager (the new version) | Muslim Scholar | 153 | 42658 |
March 12, 2013 at 1:27 am Last Post: KichigaiNeko |
|
Pascal's wager | GodlessGirl | 67 | 17976 |
August 10, 2012 at 3:04 am Last Post: Whateverist |
Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)