RE: Oh no not another free will thread.
April 26, 2018 at 10:30 pm
(This post was last modified: April 26, 2018 at 10:38 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(April 26, 2018 at 10:23 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(April 26, 2018 at 9:22 pm)henryp Wrote: That gap between who a person is and who they think they are. It might be the most interesting thing about people to me.
I find you to be a fascinating case. I think I got some more insight into that in this thread. That's really what I find interesting. Although, the implications of time travel on noncausal events is definitely an interesting hypothetical to bat around, but I don't think anyone here had much to add on that front.
I think this is a very passive-aggressive ad hominem.
He basically just trolled me like he did on my autism thread but I can't prove it and I don't care much I'm just a little disappointed about the derail.. so fuck it I won't even bother to report it myself.
(April 26, 2018 at 9:22 pm)henryp Wrote: I find you to be a fascinating case. I think I got some more insight into that in this thread. That's really what I find interesting.
So you weren't actually here for the topic you were here to psychoanalyse me. Noted.
(April 26, 2018 at 10:23 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(April 26, 2018 at 9:22 pm)henryp Wrote: That gap between who a person is and who they think they are. It might be the most interesting thing about people to me.
I find you to be a fascinating case. I think I got some more insight into that in this thread. That's really what I find interesting. Although, the implications of time travel on noncausal events is definitely an interesting hypothetical to bat around, but I don't think anyone here had much to add on that front.
I think this is a very passive-aggressive ad hominem.
It seems fallacies is basically all he has when it comes to logic. Our whole disagreement was him just repeating the same red herring and then making a strawman of my response... and ending it all with a false analogy and ad hom.
Underwhelming and dire.
But he is also clearly very stupid as well.
(April 26, 2018 at 10:26 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(April 26, 2018 at 9:22 pm)henryp Wrote: That gap between who a person is and who they think they are.
Off topic here, but you saying this reminds me of the whole "self esteem" movement that was big back when I was a teen. It was drilled into our brains so much that we should all have high self esteem. I never really bought that notion. I mean, If I do something good or right, I feel good about myself. If I do something shitty or if I fail at stuff, I feel shitty about myself. It's much better to have a realistic view of myself, rather than think I'm great just because I'm me and being me makes me awesome.
I know that's not the context you were speaking of, but it just reminded me of the whole self esteem thing.
To me priding myself makes no sense! No free will!
