Republibertariangoodguys suggest reading Ron Paul for all Americans.

[theVOID]

Knocking Obama does little for your argument Void. As I recall, most progressives on this forum call him with the pejorative of "most moderate Republican president."

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.

It's got nothing to do with any arguments, it's simply to point out that while a lot of you here (Min especially) are quick to point out that "Rich guy x supported cause y" it only seems that you're willing to point out these private interests funding politics as they pertain to the party that you wouldn't vote for. For every one time here Min has pointed out an special interest funding the tea party and then attempted to make this an argument against the party or the general ideologies of the people involved how many times has he even mentioned something to the contrary? Never. That's how often.

It's a blatant bias. I only seek to show that it's nowhere near as one-sided as Min's selective reporting would have people believe. To make a big deal of private interest funding for political causes while being intentionally partisan in the reporting of these situations is absurd, If someone had a genuine concern with private interest funding for political causes you would expect to see them raising examples of such irrespective of the general ideologies of the donors or receivers, what such behaviour shows is that the person is less interested in exposing special interests and more interested in using it as a guise to attack the opposition.