RE: The political side that is the "correct" side.
May 28, 2018 at 2:27 pm
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2018 at 2:30 pm by Mystic.)
I know, I'm not supposed to be back. Let's make today an exception.
I think a moral followed without proof whether true or not, is just as bad. And I think accepting a proof without honest reflection and perception is just as bad.
If you keep holding on to intuition, what happens when your intuition is being hit by inceptions, and going wrong everywhere else?
And if we rely on our own reasoning, what makes us think others are wrong but we are right, while everyone thinks that about themselves.
This is true with every moral, even the most desire ones for us a species for our survival.
Unfortunately, all this is a moral in itself, and I can't prove any of it.
Rather there is a proof and a proof that connects us somehow and makes us know, and if we keep running away from it are whole lives like I have been, we are set for a rude awakening.
Using the proof for our selfish motives and associating goodness with evil, and equating truth with falsehood, is the state of the majority, and although not fully comprehensively dark evil, is enough of shit mixed with holy water, to be disgusting and evil.
To answer your question with all this, to assert any view point without proof is the position of both left and right, and none of them are better, be their position is right or not, they all mix garbage with treasures, and filth with holy sustenance, and ignorance with knowledge. And all the cherry pickers do the same.
The best way out of confusion is to realize you are confused. People following their desires or idol desires, over that of truth that can only be known by honest reflection through insight through the rational eyes of love, it doesn't matter if their view points correspond to reality of what God commands inwardly and outwardly, because without proof, it's on the same level.
And I don't believe countries are built on truth but illusion of false authority to start with, and the power structure we are on even if would implement 99.9% helpful laws, based on the falsehood it is on, is highly volatile and can lead to the most severest of consequences when built on shaky falsehood grounds.
I think a moral followed without proof whether true or not, is just as bad. And I think accepting a proof without honest reflection and perception is just as bad.
If you keep holding on to intuition, what happens when your intuition is being hit by inceptions, and going wrong everywhere else?
And if we rely on our own reasoning, what makes us think others are wrong but we are right, while everyone thinks that about themselves.
This is true with every moral, even the most desire ones for us a species for our survival.
Unfortunately, all this is a moral in itself, and I can't prove any of it.
Rather there is a proof and a proof that connects us somehow and makes us know, and if we keep running away from it are whole lives like I have been, we are set for a rude awakening.
Using the proof for our selfish motives and associating goodness with evil, and equating truth with falsehood, is the state of the majority, and although not fully comprehensively dark evil, is enough of shit mixed with holy water, to be disgusting and evil.
To answer your question with all this, to assert any view point without proof is the position of both left and right, and none of them are better, be their position is right or not, they all mix garbage with treasures, and filth with holy sustenance, and ignorance with knowledge. And all the cherry pickers do the same.
The best way out of confusion is to realize you are confused. People following their desires or idol desires, over that of truth that can only be known by honest reflection through insight through the rational eyes of love, it doesn't matter if their view points correspond to reality of what God commands inwardly and outwardly, because without proof, it's on the same level.
And I don't believe countries are built on truth but illusion of false authority to start with, and the power structure we are on even if would implement 99.9% helpful laws, based on the falsehood it is on, is highly volatile and can lead to the most severest of consequences when built on shaky falsehood grounds.
