(May 30, 2018 at 12:05 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Ybe's own statements:
"Proof:
P1. If A's can"t give convincing/sufficient E (that As are able to logically reason), then As have no ability to judge E for G.
P2. I agree that As can't give convincing/sufficient E (that As are able to logically reason).
C. So, it is true they have no ability to judge (any E for G presented"
Completely ABSURD P1, since the repeated claim is that we have seen no evidence for the existence of god. We also have clearly stipulated our evidence requirements. No evidence has been presented, so there is nothing to judge. Which, of course, makes this snobbish disrespect of others absolutely hilarious.
"we have seen no evidence for the existence of god" drfuzzy. Thats "YOUR own" P1 drfuzzy.
(You are the one claiming Ts give no convincing/sufficient E just as you said above.)
So, it "...makes this snobbish disrespect of others...", even more hilarious, as it is your own disrespect that you are talking about.
