Race and IQs

[Angrboda]

I personally feel that it is worthwhile considering the bias of the researchers but it only serves as a hint as to what they are deliberately ignoring if they are  clearly biased. The bias is not itself reason to dismiss the evidence and I think that was Jor's point. Science works by providing evidence. And if you suspect that a study is biased then you have good reason to look for and expect to find counter-evidence to refute it.

Actually, I was defending myself against CapnAwesome's counterpoint, and put my mouth in motion before putting my brain in gear. I do however hold to my second point that Huggy is effectively trying to kill the message -- meaning the hypothesis that there are inherent differences -- by shooting the messenger -- the advocates and research of those supporting the hypothesis. If I had not been kneejerk reacting to CapnAwesome's challenge, that would have been the point I should have made. That being said, I still hold to that second point. As a matter of logic, refuting the evidence for A is not evidence for its opposite B. That is a classic argument from ignorance, and unless B is independently supported, we have no reason to conclude B based upon the refutation of a particular argument or piece of evidence for A. Tuskegee airmen and the intelligence of African immigrants doesn't do it for me. If Huggy's contention is that the races are inherently equal in intelligence, I've yet to see good evidence for that. So the question is, Huggy, are you saying that you believe the inherent intelligence of the races is equal, and if so, what justification do you have for that belief?