RE: Race and IQs
June 1, 2018 at 11:44 am
(This post was last modified: June 1, 2018 at 11:45 am by ohreally.)
(June 1, 2018 at 11:29 am)Alexmahone Wrote:(June 1, 2018 at 11:05 am)Khemikal Wrote: You mean, if i took the test ten times..my score would only deviate 1 or 2 points? That seems dubious.
-and the differential in affluent and poor groups within the larger subset? What does that look like?
No that's not what I meant.
For example, the mean IQ of the US is reported as 98 but it should be read as 98 +/- 1.
(June 1, 2018 at 11:23 am)ohreally Wrote: That's not how the null hypothesis works. Why would the default position be that every human is different?
Because there is no reason for populations that have evolved in separate geographical regions and vary in the mean value of several phenotypic traits to have exactly the same mean IQ.
What makes you think that the null hypothesis is that there are no differences in mean IQ's among the races?
Then what would be the null? I suggest reading the definition of the phrase first.
If water rots the soles of your boots, what does it do to your intestines?
