Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker

[Amarok]

It should be noted, that the baker did not refuse to serve homosexuals. In fact he offered to make them any other type of baked goods. He also does not make cakes for bachelor or halloween parties. 

Does not matter he refused a good he would have made for a straight couple on a similar occasion .That's discrimination .

Seems like there is a lot of twisting of the narrative in this case, to say something that was not being stated.

Nope 

 Similarly designers refused to make dresses for Melania in President Trumps inauguration.

Not the same thing in the slightest .

 I see hardly anyone advocating that someone should be able to refuse to sell to a person, simply because they are homosexual. Rather it is the right to refuse a particular service that goes against one’s conscience.

Saying you won't sell a wedding cake to a gay couple when you would do so for straight couple is straightforward discrimination.Your conscience has bearing on anything your a public for profit business not a church or a commision based business .

---

In 50 years, the people on the wrong side of this will be looked at the same way as the people who got upset when Rosa Parks sat at the front of the bus.

After all they let Rosa on the bus it not like she was refused to ride on the bus because she was black . They just didn't let he sit in the same spot as the white people . Why won't people consider the conscience  of the racist bus driver to deny a service to a black person that they would a white person . FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE MAN!!!