Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 11, 2025, 11:58 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
#68
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 5, 2018 at 8:52 am)johan Wrote:
Quote:



When I flew banner planes, we flew all kinds of banners for all kinds of customers. But I recall getting a call from a pro-life organization that wanted to fly an anti-abortion banner. They sent over the art work that wanted to fly. It was a picture of an aborted fetus. We refused to fly it. Why? Because we disagreed with the content and didn't want our business to be associated with it.

So the obvious argument here is well that's a different situation because you wouldn't fly that particular banner for anyone no matter who was paying the bill. 

Now lets go back to our baker. He will happily create a wedding cake that says 'Congratulations Bill and Hilary' on it. But he won't create a cake that says 'Congratulations Bill and Jim'. Same as with the banner company, he does this because he disagrees with the content and does not want his business associated with it. And same as with the banner company he would refuse to create this cake even if Bill and Hilary were the ones ordering it. How is that discrimination?



Quote:Businesses should be free to refuse to serve anyone they choose. Likewise the public should be free to refuse to patronize those businesses.
[/quote
If a business is selling standard goods to the general public then it should be required to accept all customers.  

Would you be OK if every single food establishment and grocery store in your county refused to sell you food?  Suppose it then extended to the entire State?  Are you still OK with it?  And then to entire nation.  Are you still OK with that?

A bakery sells standard goods to the general public.  When it refuses to sell a standard product to someone it's engaging in discrimination.  The place would be lucky not to get firebombed or shot up by the person being discriminated against.  
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker - by Wyrd of Gawd - June 5, 2018 at 7:28 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1299 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 26502 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 397 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 3869 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 592 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 1258 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 1676 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 29230 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1452 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 11718 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)