Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker

[johan]

Its exactly the same. Explain why it isn't.

Because you're asking the sign maker to provide a service that he doesn't offer to anyone. In the case of the Baker who makes wedding cakes, they simply asked for a service that he provides and they were denied specifically for the sexual preference, which as far as I know has nothing to do with baking. 

And I wouldn't fly a pro-life banner. I flew banners for other people, but I wouldn't fly one for them. And it had nothing to with airplanes or banners. Should there be a law forcing me to fly advertising that I don't want to fly?

---

Ok so its not the same because you say so. Got it. If you can't explain it, then you haven't got a valid argument.

What the Baker refused to do wedding cakes for black couples?

That should be the baker's choice. It not a choice I would personally support. But I believe its a choice a providers of non-essential services should have the right to make. We're not talking about housing or health care here. We're talking about cake. No one needs cake ever.