RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 6, 2018 at 3:15 am
(This post was last modified: June 6, 2018 at 3:21 am by Wyrd of Gawd.)
(June 5, 2018 at 9:02 pm)johan Wrote:(June 5, 2018 at 7:28 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:
Quote:Would you be OK if every single food establishment and grocery store in your county refused to sell you food? Suppose it then extended to the entire State? Are you still OK with it? And then to entire nation. Are you still OK with that?Well obviously I wouldn't be happy about it but is that what we're really discussing here? Is the issue really every business that exists refusing to serve someone? Is that what you're honestly arguing is the reason why we need a law? So that doesn't happen?
Well obviously if one place can refuse to sell you food all of the other food places can use your logic to refuse to sell you food. That's the way you end up with a Jim Crow society.
Personally I wouldn't want food from a place that discriminated against me. The assholes could tamper with it. But if a pissed off potential customer returned and burned down the place and gutted everyone like fish I wouldn't find him guilty of any crimes against the bigots. That's why we have guns and gas, right?
And the hilarious thing is that the WLB wants everyone to stand for the racist national anthem. While the baker case wasn't racial it was still making a mockery of what the country is claiming to be for. The plaintiffs were probably just trying to get some money from the bigot. If they had truly been outraged over their treatment they would have blasted the guy. Happens everyday in America.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-penn...s-brother/
https://www.ajc.com/news/national/barber...inv4jz8sO/
(June 5, 2018 at 9:02 pm)johan Wrote:(June 5, 2018 at 7:28 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:
Quote:Would you be OK if every single food establishment and grocery store in your county refused to sell you food? Suppose it then extended to the entire State? Are you still OK with it? And then to entire nation. Are you still OK with that?Well obviously I wouldn't be happy about it but is that what we're really discussing here? Is the issue really every business that exists refusing to serve someone? Is that what you're honestly arguing is the reason why we need a law? So that doesn't happen?
Well obviously if one place can refuse to sell you food all of the other food places can use your logic to refuse to sell you food. That's the way you end up with a Jim Crow society.
Personally I wouldn't want food from a place that discriminated against me. The assholes could tamper with it. But if a pissed off potential customer returned and burned down the place and gutted everyone like fish I wouldn't find him guilty of any crimes against the bigots. That's why we have guns and gas, right?
And the hilarious thing is that the WLB wants everyone to stand for the racist national anthem. While the baker case wasn't racial it was still making a mockery of what the country is claiming to be for. The plaintiffs were probably just trying to get some money from the bigot. If they had truly been outraged over their treatment they would have blasted the guy. Happens everyday in America.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-penn...s-brother/
https://www.ajc.com/news/national/barber...inv4jz8sO/
The format & edit features seems to be hosed up.
