(June 6, 2018 at 1:06 pm)Khemikal Wrote: It's just a silly and constant attempt to frame the discussion as though it were something else. A bigot refused service on account of his bigotry. That;s what happened. An artist wasn;t being compelled to paint a masterpiece by the state. The success of that silly narrative misdirection is expressed in people who probably aren;t gay hatin closet queers repeating the comments as though they were the gospel of saint douche.
The world that some people don;t think they want to live in..that very terrible world, is one where bigots don;t have carte blanche to be bigots. Oh, the horror!
Now, if bigots want their bigotry to be taken seriously (and they do, they want it -sooooooo- bad)..then they should own it for what it is and make -that- case...and not babble to us about the evils of compelling artistic masterpieces. Tell us how allowing that bigotry serves the best interests of the state and it;s people...as it is, for what it is, without all the bullshit.
So much anger in this. I could address your comments but frankly dealing with your level of anger is not worth it for me. Probably better for all involved if we just let you go on being angry and me go on being happy. Have a nice day.
