(June 7, 2018 at 3:15 pm)A Theist Wrote: You're the one who's bitching and rambling. You're disappointed and butt hurt because the Supreme Court sided with the Baker instead of siding with the anti-Christian bigots in Colorado's farce civil rights commission and with the lower courts. Didn't happen the way you wanted because the bigots on your side of the fence got slapped down this time.
I would agree that the decision is an example of SCOTUS disapproving of anti-Christian bigotry in the CCRC, but that isn't the same thing as siding with the baker in anything but that narrow matter. In that, I don't think your description of the decision is accurate. Do you believe that the court should have or could have ruled in favor of the baker on the more general question of whether his refusal should have been exempted from the public accommodation law?