(June 7, 2018 at 3:18 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Does that answer your question, Jorg, lol?
Look, A, if you think that being pro civil rights is being anti-christian..who I am to argue, it;s your stupid religion, do it your way. Personally, Imma continue doing 'murica my way, with our farce of civil rights and all. I don;t personally take issue with the ruling, but then again I don;lt have a fairy tale version of the ruling in mind to take issue with. I think that guilty people -should- be able to get off on a technicality. Makes it harder for the guv;mint to railroad people. Better 100 guilty go free than a single innocent imprisoned, and all that. Like I said, this is your own personal OJ moment. If you couldn;t understand those people before...well..now you;re one of them.
How does that make you feel? Wanna share?
: shrugs :
The way I see it, K, you're not pro civil rights, and I believe that you did take issue with it. True advocates of civil rights don't pick and choose who gets equal protection under the law. Colorado's farce civil rights commission showed the same hostility toward the Baker's Christian faith as you do and got slapped down for it by the Supreme Court.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.