Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 11, 2025, 11:54 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 8, 2018 at 9:58 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:
(June 8, 2018 at 9:46 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: If you don't see the difference between being alt-right and simply being gay, I don't know what to tell you man.

That kind of sounds like you are saying you can be predjudice  depending on who it is. It’s easy to say that for those you like, that you can’t discriminate, but the test is when you have to apply it to this you do not.

But what I meant, is that there isn’t a difference, where the same reasoning wouldn’t apply(if one is consistent in their logic).

If a nazi-shirt-wearing, loudmouthed asshole with a huge cross hanging around his neck comes into your restaurant, you can ask him to leave based on his clothing, based on him being a nazi, and based on him being a disruptive asshole. You can't say "we don't serve christians here, you have to leave."

Same goes the other way - if a gay couple comes to your restaurant, cause a huge ruckus and start shouting about how Bernie's the messiah, you can ask them leave based on everything except "we don't serve gays, get out."

You aren't allowed to discriminate against someone for simply who they are - generally seen as things they don't have control over, like race, sex, orientation, age etc.  Political views, behaviors, clothing, etc are not part of those protected groups. We've seen in the past that if you're allowed to discriminate based on things like race, minorities get a HELL of a lot less access to just about everything from jobs to services to healthcare. The whole point of protected groups is trying to mitigate that imbalance and secure a modicum of equal opportunity/access.

It would be great if anti-discrimination laws were unnecessary, but currently they are, because without them groups suffer unfairly simply based on things they can't control.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker - by FatAndFaithless - June 8, 2018 at 10:06 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1299 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 26502 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 397 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 3869 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 592 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 1258 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 1676 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 29230 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1452 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 11718 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)