(June 8, 2018 at 1:14 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(June 8, 2018 at 1:11 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: How many times do I need to repeat it. It’s not about being able to refuse service because someone is same sex attracted. I don’t agree with that and don’t see anyone suggesting that."It" is definitely about that. If it weren;t, then they would have no issue with selling gay cakes, and no grounds to complain to scotus about not being able to discriminate against the gays, or for having been found afoul of civil rights law in doing so. If a group sues the court for the right to discriminate against gays....that's the "it" they want.
Quote:Since you have been told numerous times what it is and is not. Is this the part where I accuse you of being either disingenuous or stupid?See, was that so hard? You disagree with "it" and them. Now I can put you in the naive pile where every decent human being accidentally on the wrong side of some issue can safely be momma birded.
You have no clue what the argument is. But don’t seem to care.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
