(June 8, 2018 at 2:12 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Another fun thing to mull over..just running with the notion above (since we seem entirely unaware of the concept of lying for effect.....lawyers would -never- do that, lol.....) if baking cakes is producing material specifically against their yadda yadda yadda....wtf are they doing running a cake shop?
Is baking cakes somehow in opposition to their "conscience"...as bakers, or is the sexuality of the customer in opposition to their "conscience"?
(June 8, 2018 at 2:11 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Isn’t debating RR, fun? He’s never actually saying anything that he’s actually saying, and when you ask to him to explain what he’s actually saying...he doesn’t wanna say, lol.
Oh, IDK if I;d call it a debate, lol.
Now who is being disengenous or playing dumb. After numerous times being corrected, you are still ignoring what this is about, and replacing with a false narrative.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
