Here is an article, describing what I am talking about.
https://www.str.org/blog/religious-liber...xrnYiApCUk
Should we be discussing the discrimination of religious liberty? Perhaps we should be talking about peoples religious predjudice, instead of the ideas?
Or we could twist the narrative to say that those who refused to design a dress for the women in the Trump inauguration as being sexist.
Quote:Today, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case. I recommend you read this article by David French to clear up a major misconception about the case that’s being promoted out there. The article responds to a New York Times opinion piece that completely misunderstands the case, claiming it’s about denying people services “because of who they are.” (See here and here for more responses to this common mistake.)
https://www.str.org/blog/religious-liber...xrnYiApCUk
Should we be discussing the discrimination of religious liberty? Perhaps we should be talking about peoples religious predjudice, instead of the ideas?
Quote:If progressive designers refuse to design dresses for the Trump women, they’re not discriminating on the basis of sex. They’re refusing to elevate and help honor a political family they dislike....
Or we could twist the narrative to say that those who refused to design a dress for the women in the Trump inauguration as being sexist.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
