Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 12, 2025, 12:03 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 10, 2018 at 9:13 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: @RR, why does religious “liberty” so often involve taking something away from someone else?  Why is interfering with the lives of consenting adults (and paying customers) regarded as a freedom Christians think society owes them?

If a business owner is not willing to provide his goods and services to every paying customer in the general public equally, because he can’t distinguish between business ethics and his personal, private religious beliefs, then maybe he shouldn’t have a business at all.  

FWIW, the court found similar attitudes in the Commission to be hostile to religion and not reflective of the neutrality toward free exercise claims that the law required.  To wit:

Quote:The neutral and respectful consideration to which Phillips  was  entitled  was  compromised  here,  however.    The Civil Rights Commission’s treatment of his case has some elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs that motivated his objection. That  hostility  surfaced  at  the  Commission’s  formal, public  hearings,  as  shown  by  the  record.    On  May  30, 2014, the seven-member Commission convened publicly to consider Phillips’ case.  At several points during its meeting, commissioners endorsed the view that religious beliefs cannot  legitimately  be  carried  into  the  public  sphere  or commercial  domain,  implying  that  religious  beliefs  and persons are less than fully welcome in Colorado’s business community.  One  commissioner  suggested  that  Phillips can believe “what he wants to believe,” but cannot act on his  religious  beliefs  “if  he  decides  to  do  business  in  the state.”  Tr.  23.  A  few  moments  later,  the  commissioner restated  the  same  position:  “[I]f  a  businessman  wants  to do business in the state and he’s got an issue with the — the law’s impacting his personal belief system, he needs to look  at  being  able  to  compromise.”     Id.,  at  30.

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker - by Angrboda - June 10, 2018 at 1:15 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1299 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 26502 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 397 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 3869 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 592 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 1258 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 1676 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 29230 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1452 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 11718 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 20 Guest(s)