(June 16, 2018 at 9:26 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: I had hoped for other things for this thread. Perhaps a discussion of the role of dogma in science ala Thomas Kuhn's scientific revolutions. I take it from some quarters, Kuhn's central thesis is regarded as at best an inaccurate simplification, but I think the question of whether there is such a thing as scientific dogma and what that means may be an interesting one, even if Sheldrake himself is out to lunch.
Most scientists prefer Popper to Kuhn:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarcatio...ifiability
