RE: Refusing service because of political party.
June 25, 2018 at 4:01 pm
(This post was last modified: June 25, 2018 at 4:02 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(June 25, 2018 at 3:49 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I don't think you're seeing the double edge to this sword.
https://www.opposingviews.com/category/t...interstate
Do you understand how easy it will become to discriminate (or hide real motives for discrimination) based on political affiliations?
Many are already discriminated against based on the likely voting pattern of their demographic sector.
Those who facilitate those kind of discrimination ought therefore be free from risk of discrimination themselves?
(June 25, 2018 at 3:59 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(June 25, 2018 at 3:52 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Considering the aggravation the Log Cabin Republicans cause for the rest of the conservatives, I would really be put out if they were discriminated against in this way.
I'm also not sure Sarah Sanders is a net positive for Trumply. I'm thinking of the damage Westboro has done to Christianity, and Trumply's slash and burn of conservativism and Sarah's transparent waffling for him isn't all that convincing.
By her lights separating kids from their parents is biblical. Who knew?
(June 25, 2018 at 3:54 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: While what the owner did isn't illegal and political affiliation isn't (and shouldn't be) a protected status... I think it's pretty petty and idiotic to boot her out like that. It helps nobody and will only cause a shitstorm from one side or another. If Sanders wasn't causing a disturbance or being rude to the staff, etc, then just let her eat her meal.
Decent treatment for indecent people would be the decent thing to do.
That depends on what effects indecent treatment of indecent people will likely eventually have.
