(June 26, 2018 at 12:37 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:(June 26, 2018 at 12:14 pm)SteveII Wrote: This is great. Kit actually found a meme about atheism that contradicts itself in just 12 words.
Reject = dismiss as inadequate
Considering the evidence of anything and dismissing it as inadequate for a conclusion is itself an assertion.
Rubbish.
There is no assertion required by not being convinced by the evidence provided for a claim.
If I am a juror in a case where I feel the prosecution has not met their burden of proof, in order for me to vote guilty, I am not making an assertion that I feel the accused is innocent.
That is NOT what the meme said. It specifically said 'reject'. So for your example to be analogous, you would say I 'reject' the proposition that the man is guilty (meme: reject what you have failed to prove). If you did, the meaning would be that he is innocent--an assertion. But your analogy actually has another problem: even concluding that the evidence is insufficient is itself an assertion that the evidence is insufficient.
Which brings us to the broader problem: I think the only way to rescue the idea that atheism make no assertions is there can be zero evidence. But there is some presented, so you are stuck passing judgement on that evidence.