The name of God thread.

[drfuzzy]

Jest?
There is no verifiable, replicatable, testable hard data for any deity ever named by a human and when we point out this clear fact for not being swayed by your daydreams, you call it jesting?   
That's so sad.

You're playful with the proofs and don't listen properly. So you remain blind and stupid.

(sigh)
one more time 
arguments aren't "proofs"
quotes from books aren't "proofs"
personal stories aren't "proofs"
personal experience isn't "proof"

Hard data is proof.  Recorded audio, video, clear solid data that shows that something supernatural clearly exists (and I'm not sure about Muslim supernatural testing procedures but the Catholic Church has spectacularly failed at this task) -- data that can be tested by a different team of researchers that will lead to the same conclusions.