(June 29, 2018 at 10:09 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I've even had people argue, that only claims of what are true have the burden of proof. That they can claim that something is false (rejecting) and have no burden. However this is bad logic, because even when you are claiming something is false, you are still making an objective truth claim.
On here? I haven't seen that myself but I am happy to be proved wrong. The whole point of a burden of proof is to determine whether a claim is true. Are you sure you didn't misunderstand what they were saying?