RE: Atheism
June 29, 2018 at 3:24 pm
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2018 at 3:25 pm by Mystic.)
If a person takes their time to prove something, and there is many arguments for existence of God, before dismissing God and proofs for him, there needs to be some level of sincerity to the truth and not coming simply to reject.
And just like it's not good enough to assert God to existence, it's not good enough to simply deny proofs of God as proofs, with showing no rational reason why the proofs don't stand to reason.
I remember when a person to reject an argument even said it's not objective that torturing an innocent soul like a baby for eternity for no crime it has committed, to be objectively evil in all possible worlds.
And people think by denying such a premise, they can do away with an argument proving God. Goodness and God go together, you can't separate the two, neither can you separate God from his Messengers.
There are proofs and layers of the proofs, and insights and layers of insights that prove and manifest God.
What I conclude with every culture in the world having proofs of God, is Atheists are either too apathetic or rebellious to acknowledge God.
And just like it's not good enough to assert God to existence, it's not good enough to simply deny proofs of God as proofs, with showing no rational reason why the proofs don't stand to reason.
I remember when a person to reject an argument even said it's not objective that torturing an innocent soul like a baby for eternity for no crime it has committed, to be objectively evil in all possible worlds.
And people think by denying such a premise, they can do away with an argument proving God. Goodness and God go together, you can't separate the two, neither can you separate God from his Messengers.
There are proofs and layers of the proofs, and insights and layers of insights that prove and manifest God.
What I conclude with every culture in the world having proofs of God, is Atheists are either too apathetic or rebellious to acknowledge God.