Atheism

[surreptitious57]

There is no such thing as the specific Gospel message. If there was there would only be one Gospel instead of four. None of the four Gospel
writers actually knew Jesus and they were written twenty to eighty years after his death. None of them is therefore primary source material

The Gospel of Matthew is actually plagiarised from the Gospel of Mark which should automatically invalidate its inclusion in the New Testament yet it is there
The one Gospel that was primary source material was the Gospel of Mary Magdalene who was a cousin of Jesus but it was omitted because she was a woman

Furthermore the Gospel message was not love because Jesus very specifically stated that he came not to bring peace but a sword
There is no way this can be interpreted metaphorically since it is so obvious that to suggest it is metaphor would be simply wrong

Also there are different versions of the Bible with specific verses either included or omitted that do not appear in other versions of the Bible

And if the Bible is the word of God it should all be accepted without question. This would include both Old and New Testaments not just the
Gospels regardless of what the OT actually says. To therefore not include it and deliberately so is simply cherry picking of the highest order

Your highly sophisticated objections will fit right in with a certain group at AF. Unfortunately I am picky with whom I respond to. Sorry

The least relevant thing about an argument is who ever is making it so you should be focusing on what I have said not who I am
Now being picky with who you respond to is entirely your choice of course but this in no way invalidates what I have actually said

Also I do not say things to fit in rather I say them because I either think or know them to be true