Atheism

[Amarok]

I don't know... and neither do you if you don't listen to it. Maybe something will be presented in a new way that will resonate.  As I said, it's one thing, if you don't want to listen or discuss; or if you have a disagreement with something specific. It's another to just attack a persons character, without even hearing them out. 

I don't think that most atheists disagree with Christianity for rational reasons, and many may mention critical thinking, much more than they practice it;  but I'm will to discuss an idea.  Perhaps I have a misunderstanding, or will learn something.  Or we can all just stay in our perspective echo chambers. I also find that most of the things people call fallacious (such as the kalam cosmological argument) is full of  bad thinking.  And when given reason for why it is bad logic;  atheists fall back to name calling and attacking the person.   Would you like me to judge you based on past experience, or should I be at least willing to hear you out?

More baseless accusation and whining and no you never present good reasons just spew talking points and are rightly chewed out for it .

---

Ok... that doesn't fit my experience.   But I'm happy to discuss specifics (even though I've probably heard it all before as well).  We may not come to agree; however if you just say "la la la" and stick your fingers in your ears (as well as insult people), then don't be surprised if I judge you based on that!

Your experience does not mean diddly and no you have no interest in discussion you just want to preach the apologist gospel and then whine when we don't give it the respect it does not deserve .

---

Translation:  la la la la.... I can’t hear you in my echo chamber. 

If you don’t want to be reasonable, or listen to others views, that’s one thing. But attacking someone’s character for no reason only weakens your position.

No translation your kind never presents anything new all your nonsense has been crushed . And your leaping over to a video is not hear someone out if you can't defend theism yourself i have no use for you .And chewing out apologists does not weaken anything .

---

Just a note: this is a short video; one of the one minute apologist videos. Certainly not extensive, and doesn’t make the case for the Christian history. But does fit into the discussion on evidence. Which is why I posted it. 

It does not matter present his case or be quite 

J. Wallace is a retired cold case detective, formally aggressive atheist who became a Christian because of the evidence.

No one cares about his previous job or his previous position none of that grants him credibility or means he went with the evidence or even understood it.

---

I don't know if I will have time to watch.... Perhaps I should I just stop when he says he's an atheist as well as  call him an idiot and a liar?

By all means because your already thinking it oh and of course you "don't have time"

If you have an issue, with something that I bring up, then feel free to chime in

To which you will then fail to address