RE: Massacre of the Innocents
July 20, 2018 at 9:42 am
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2018 at 10:27 am by Huggy Bear.)
(July 20, 2018 at 9:14 am)Succubus Wrote:(July 19, 2018 at 2:55 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Except no real historians think the same as you do...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
Virtually all New Testament scholars and Near East historians, applying the standard criteria of historical investigation, find that the historicity of Jesus is effectively certain although they differ about the beliefs and teachings of Jesus as well as the accuracy of the details of his life that have been described in the gospels. While scholars have criticized Jesus scholarship for religious bias and lack of methodological soundness, with very few exceptions such critics generally do support the historicity of Jesus and reject the Christ myth theory that Jesus never existed.
Oww goody, time to post this again.
All the 'bible scholars' listed below are from the references in your link.
There are clearly 124 references listed (they are numbered dummy), among which are Richard Carrier and Bart Ehrman, tell me why you only list 36?
(That's a rhetorical question btw)
You're clearly a dishonest troll.
*EDIT*
Upon further investigation it looks like the majority of your 'bible scholars' aren't even listed in the references of the Wikki link (I see three: James Dunn, Scot McKnight and Bruce M. Metzger)
So I'm curious as to where you really obtained your list.
Is bald faced lying a new atheist tactic now?
Oh yeah, shout out to Mister Agenda for kudosing that nonsense, and you guys refer to theists as sheep...