(July 23, 2018 at 1:59 pm)Succubus Wrote:It's worse. Not only that, they claim their god insist they chuck out all morality and human decency in favour of the god of the bible and his support for genocide, human sacrifice, rape, incest, pedophilia, child murder, and to cap it all unicorns, talking donkeys, talking bushes, talking snakes, and child murder. And while all of that is sanctioned by their hold god in their holy bible, they are perfectly happy to flat out lie and state that such immoral atrocities are not in the holey babble. Then when the verses in question are pointed out in that very book of shit, their next port of call is "out of context", "you are taking it out of context".(July 23, 2018 at 9:10 am)Fireball Wrote: [opens Atheist's Guide to the Internet to page 1, line 2]: "Rudeness to theists of all stripes must be evidenced every day". See, it's in the script!
...but I just lurve how many people blanket atheists as being angry. What a canard.
Don't forget our arrogance and lack of humility!
I mean they tell us that via prayer, they are in one on one daily communication with the geezer who created the universe.
That's being humble is it???
Dunno about anyone else, but I fail to see where human sacrifice, rape, genocide, child murder or any of that trash can be taken it any other context than as plainly stated in that evil tome.
The next port of call is that jebus and the NT obviated all those all mosaic laws. Really? There go the ten commandments in that case. Those are part of the Tanakh. The laws of Moses. In the OT. If jebus shut down the OT laws, the 10 are right out being part of the 613 mitzvot.
Ah, the christian will claim, Jebus made a new covenant which obviated the OT commandments. Well, according to the bible, nope.
Then they move along to "oh, well jebus endorsed the ten" another lie. Jebus endorsed 5 of those and none of the ones involved in god according to your bible.
"Ah, they say, Jebus endorsed the golden rule" Nope, the bible authors plagiarised that from much earlier sources. The principle had been around for a long time before jebus. Even then, christians get it wrong. "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" is not about retribution, but about the principle that the punishment should not exceed the crime. A reasonable principle one might think, but it took christianity to entirely fuck it up.
