Atheism

[Amarok]

Ok, so the reasoning only follows if the designer was wanting to, and/or capable of making an optimal design (apparently as determined by you). So then if either of these premises are false, then the conclusion is invalid.

And you can give a reasonable evidence based non ad hoc reason  that being powerful enough and knowledgeable enough to create life and i would imagine every system in the known universe  .Would not be capable of creating an optimal universe ? 

And you can give non ad hoc reason that this designer would not create an optimal universe and life ?

And you third point is essentially"stop asking why stuff isn't optimal because i have no answer f"

And even better question what would an undesigned universe look like? At what point would the universe be too sub optimal to be designed?

And by all means attack the premises but as i have shown above you have alot of explaining to do .