(August 24, 2018 at 12:45 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(August 24, 2018 at 12:31 pm)negatio Wrote: What I am saying is that the language of law per se is not efficient to determine our acts
That has some truth to it, but it's not an absolute truth, which is why you need to reformulate your argument. Your argument, as stated, depends on it being absolute. A general rule that holds.
It simply doesn't.
Law is at least efficient enough to keep me from doing something I want to do, and I'm just discussing human law, here.
The contention is that law, in the general sense, demonstrates incompetence on the part of a god...but..again in the general...it doesn't. It may in reference to some specific law. Ultimately I'd agree with you, that god is awfully dumb for a god and some of that can be seen in gods laws. I'm suggesting that your particular line of reasoning doesn't demonstrate that. Mostly, because it's just not sound, no matter how many times you reassert it our who's authority you cite.
-or how many words you use to communicate it......
Me man, me find law sometimes determinitive. You wrong. Feel me?
(That one was straight up for you, Emjay, lol)
Are you calling me dumb? Oh right, I already did
I'm gradually getting there, so I probably will comment on it at some point. But till then I'll happily take the Khemikal Digest
