It would make sense that it was Pence as he is probably biding his time waiting for Trump to blow up and then step in to become president. If he can then say that he was part of the resistance then it means that he can avoid the fallout from Trump's departure.
Of course it would be simple for the NYT to just claim this and watch Trump sack everyone around him. I doubt they did make it up though. But this also points again to Pence as the author. Because his position is the safest no matter who Trump replaces. Can a president get rid of a vice president?
What would the motives be for anyone else writing this? All they do is risk losing their jobs.
Of course it would be simple for the NYT to just claim this and watch Trump sack everyone around him. I doubt they did make it up though. But this also points again to Pence as the author. Because his position is the safest no matter who Trump replaces. Can a president get rid of a vice president?
What would the motives be for anyone else writing this? All they do is risk losing their jobs.