Finnaly! Right throught this argument I have asked for an argument against my hypothesis rather than just 'belive me, I know'. The last two posts were a step in the right direction. Now I can actully evaluate the argument against Jesus Christ existing without having to guess at the evidence that inclines you to think in that direction. However, I must ask, what took you so long?
'Not to mention that Jesus Christ is not even a proper name but a title'
Chatpilot, I don't know how many times I have said to you that I know that Jesus Christ is a Greek title and that I have never surmised that the man whent by that name. Either you do not read my posts (rude) or that is your trump card in all arguments concerning Christs existence (rather weak trump card). Please stop, I am getting rather tired of it.
'The only contemporary accounts of Jesus by Josephus was faked.'
Intresting. Can you elaborate?
'Not a single physical description of the man, his hight, his hair colour, his face.'
Same with William Wallace.
'He fed thousands, he raised people from the dead, and no one, no disciple or follower wrote it down.'
Never said Jesus Christ did miricles, only that he may have existed.
'Not to mention that Jesus Christ is not even a proper name but a title'
Chatpilot, I don't know how many times I have said to you that I know that Jesus Christ is a Greek title and that I have never surmised that the man whent by that name. Either you do not read my posts (rude) or that is your trump card in all arguments concerning Christs existence (rather weak trump card). Please stop, I am getting rather tired of it.
'The only contemporary accounts of Jesus by Josephus was faked.'
Intresting. Can you elaborate?
'Not a single physical description of the man, his hight, his hair colour, his face.'
Same with William Wallace.
'He fed thousands, he raised people from the dead, and no one, no disciple or follower wrote it down.'
Never said Jesus Christ did miricles, only that he may have existed.
