RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 3:55 pm
(This post was last modified: September 9, 2018 at 4:41 pm by negatio.)
(September 9, 2018 at 12:54 pm)Losty Wrote:(September 9, 2018 at 4:42 am)negatio Wrote: Okay, since you say that you were referring to being tired of continually correcting my posts, and, were not commenting on the post I had just sent to Abaddon, which, to me, your statement appeared to be.
Oh, yes, if you were correcting my mistakes ad infinitum, why the hell didn't you tell me what I was doing wrong, instead of suffering?! What is this unethical thing staff has about withholding code knowledge from Newbies, or, maybe you did so inform me, and the information was flawed...I was under such extreme psychological stress, being under constant attack then...and now, you have got to be bullshitting me, because I do not think there are extra tags in my posts. Everytime I try to type the code I use out in this box it fails to send when I press post reply. However you guys are able to send code. If I could send you what I am doing, we could sort it out. I just do not see how there can be any superfluity in my code now, it is so terse now that, if it were cut down, it would not function, that much I do now know. Negatio.
Myself and others did take the time to tell you how to do it correctly, but sure, keep being dishonest.
Having you, Losty, repeatedly accuse me of being dishonest, when it is not what is happening, is as maddening as me ascribing fault to you, for you. Here is what happened. Abaddon did tell me early on that one had to be very careful and precise regarding the spacing when doing code. I successful did Reply to Mathtilda immediately; then under all of the tremendous pressure of being continually insulted; harassed; put into a double bind; in combination with a recent serious exposure to round-up, I lost touch with the Abaddon instruction; and, started using paradigm examples sent from other members, which misrepresented the spacing, thus I had too many spaces, which brought more damn trouble. Now, thanks to emjay's careful tutoring I am doing OK, end of story. Negatio.
(September 9, 2018 at 12:53 pm)KevinM1 Wrote:(September 9, 2018 at 2:55 am)negatio Wrote: The above is an absurd claim. Of course I can dilute, even annihilate, the substance of an argument by the manner in which the argument is communicated. Reference the interchange between Jormungandr and myself, where she posited an argument which I shot-down precisely on the basis of the fallacious manner wherein she communicated the argument.
Please do not accuse me of bullshitting, I do not intentionally bullshit/mislead others. I am not bullshitting when I say you appear to be constantly on the rag! Negatio.
Cool sexism, bro. Please, continue showing the world exactly who you are.
And, someone presenting something fallaciously != using language that can be widely understood. Using clearer language doesn't necessitate a dilution of any argument.
Tell you what - howabout you at least try? If you don't want to simply be considered a troll, that's the best way to do it.
I have not merely tried, and, I have repeatedly informed members that a rewritten version of Part I of the OP appears on page 19 #184 of my thread. Sexism now. What sexism?
(September 9, 2018 at 12:25 am)Whateverist Wrote:(September 8, 2018 at 5:44 pm)negatio Wrote: Whateverist, what does QFT mean? Negatio
I had to look it up too: Quoted For Truth
I think I asked too. It is better just to google it in order to be less of a drag. I learned. You can too.
Abaddon did Google QFT, and, there were four possibilities, none of which was Quoted for Truth, but they were heavy duty. Negatio.
