Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 1:46 am
(This post was last modified: September 9, 2018 at 1:55 am by Abaddon_ire.)
(September 9, 2018 at 1:41 am)Khemikal Wrote: Magic hateball says yes, definitely. 
Forum deadweight, likely to suffer a culling.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:46 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (September 9, 2018 at 1:41 am)Khemikal Wrote: Magic hateball says yes, definitely.
Forum deadweight, likely to suffer a culling.
Actually, when I rocked up here, I was slightly annoyed that I was regarded with suspicion.
Now I know why that was.
(September 7, 2018 at 8:51 pm)negatio Wrote: (September 7, 2018 at 3:15 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Nobody can make head nor tail of it and we are mostly atheists here anyway.
Abaddon_ire Wrote:Nobody can make head nor tail of it
Jormungandr completely, totally, absolutely understood, all on her very own, the simple, simple, radically simple logical progression of, and the meaning of the disproof, and, reported that understanding to us. She took the time to concentrate on what she was facing in the text, and came out a winner!
Abaddon, a whole bunch of the time you have your facts mixed-up. Although I cannot possibly thank you enough for showing such concern for my situation here, wow, thank you! Negatio.
You have intentionally munged my words with Jorgs. Fuck off.
Posts: 259
Threads: 1
Joined: August 20, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am
(September 9, 2018 at 1:37 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (September 8, 2018 at 5:44 pm)negatio Wrote: Whateverist, what does QFT mean? Negatio Fucking christ on a unicycle.
Let me once again google that for you.
Are you really this bone ass lazy?
The last thing I am is lazy. Perhaps I am so busy elsewhere that a cryptic indeterminate designation for something, when the author will not respond with the requested answer, soon fades into ground, as in background, losing itself as figure. Now, did you know that the very first writers made their living making literary portraits of rich patrons. I do believe it high-time you had your portrait written, and, since you have failed to re-write Duane over into your preferred being for him, perhaps you may permit Duane to write your portrait, fragmentarily, of course, bit by bit, I would conjecture and conjure what I see when I imagine what and where you are? Okay? Negatio.
Posts: 33249
Threads: 1416
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 1:58 am
Posts: 67292
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 2:01 am
If a third person personality takes a piss, does that make it's owner a peeping tom?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 2:21 am
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: (September 9, 2018 at 1:37 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Fucking christ on a unicycle.
Let me once again google that for you.
Are you really this bone ass lazy?
The last thing I am is lazy. You are demonstrably lazy. Stop with the lies.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: Perhaps I am so busy elsewhere that a cryptic indeterminate designation for something, I am busy fucking everywhere, doesnt stop me, but oddly stops you from any attempt at rationality
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: when the author will not respond with the requested answer, That is a fucking outrageous slur. You should retract it without delay. You are yourself an author who responds to nothing at all.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: soon fades into ground, as in background, losing itself as figure. Aww poor you. Not.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: Now, did you know that the very first writers made their living making literary portraits of rich patrons. I do believe it high-time you had your portrait written, and, since you have failed to re-write Duane over into your preferred being for him, perhaps you may permit Duane to write your portrait, Positing whatever is in your head in the third person is a hallmark of abject nuttery.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: fragmentarily, of course, bit by bit, I would conjecture and conjure what I see when I imagine what and where you are? Okay? Negatio. No. Not Ok.
Posts: 259
Threads: 1
Joined: August 20, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 2:21 am
(September 9, 2018 at 12:48 am)Losty Wrote: negatio Wrote:I am now asking for your honest opinion: Am I coding correctly now?
(September 9, 2018 at 12:40 am)negatio Wrote: [quote-''Vulcanlogician'']
No, you’re still adding in extra tags for no reason.
[/quote]
Pardon me if I immediately fail, once again, to understand. You are saying that there is still something extra in what I am writing...the formula is so very tiny as it is now, what on earth is extra there?! What extra tags, plural; there are only two tags: author Wrote:and I am very very tired at the moment, and even the box we are in together, now, appears abnormal, because your response in now showing in the box wherein I am supposed to type my response to you?! Oh, we must now be in source mode, which I really wish to stay in at all times, but cannot see how to...Negatio
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 2:28 am
Any reply to your post is going to be messed up because you messed it up to begin with.
Go back and look at your post that I quoted and you can see easily that it has an extra tag in it just by looking at it.
Also, why are you calling Khem a cracker? Are you a racist?
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 259
Threads: 1
Joined: August 20, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 2:35 am
(September 9, 2018 at 2:21 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: The last thing I am is lazy. You are demonstrably lazy. Stop with the lies.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: Perhaps I am so busy elsewhere that a cryptic indeterminate designation for something, I am busy fucking everywhere, doesnt stop me, but oddly stops you from any attempt at rationality
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: when the author will not respond with the requested answer, That is a fucking outrageous slur. You should retract it without delay. You are yourself an author who responds to nothing at all.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: soon fades into ground, as in background, losing itself as figure. Aww poor you. Not.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: Now, did you know that the very first writers made their living making literary portraits of rich patrons. I do believe it high-time you had your portrait written, and, since you have failed to re-write Duane over into your preferred being for him, perhaps you may permit Duane to write your portrait, Positing whatever is in your head in the third person is a hallmark of abject nuttery.
(September 9, 2018 at 1:56 am)negatio Wrote: fragmentarily, of course, bit by bit, I would conjecture and conjure what I see when I imagine what and where you are? Okay? Negatio. No. Not Ok.
Posts: 1227
Threads: 6
Joined: September 17, 2017
Reputation:
23
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 2:47 am
Only 436 pages to go. We're close guys.
Posts: 259
Threads: 1
Joined: August 20, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 2:55 am
(September 8, 2018 at 9:15 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: The substance of an argument is not somehow diluted by the manner in which it is communicated. That's a bullshit cop out. Try again. Or don't. I really don't care.
The above is an absurd claim. Of course I can dilute, even annihilate, the substance of an argument by the manner in which the argument is communicated. Reference the interchange between Jormungandr and myself, where she posited an argument which I shot-down precisely on the basis of the fallacious manner wherein she communicated the argument.
Please do not accuse me of bullshitting, I do not intentionally bullshit/mislead others. I am not bullshitting when I say you appear to be constantly on the rag! Negatio.
|
![[Image: New_duane.jpg]](https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/002/242/New_duane.jpg){kind=icon}
