RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 7:30 am
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2018 at 7:39 am by The Grand Nudger.)
(September 11, 2018 at 3:46 am)negatio Wrote: When a newbie unknowingly and unintentionally posts a ''text wall'', he has thereby, immediately poisoned the wells against himself by exhibiting a key
cardinal "troll" characteristic, as a troll is conceived by certain biases of pre-conception held by both staff and members of the forum, who, together, from
a point of departure that is the OP, proceed, with relish, to intently apply a methodology of insult, whereby a newbie, via goading, is made to appear to
be a troll, or, in the language of the outside world, a "criminal".
The Forum is a perfect microcosm of the actual world of law/jurisprudence transpiring outside of the forum.
Or..outside possibility, it was what happened -after- the textwall that cemented your identity as the newest troll in a long line of trolls. Though..sure, the textwall is a bad opening gambit.
Let's try to move past that..again, shall we? Your contention as regards the nature of human determination and laws interaction with it...is, at the very least, not uniformly true (and, at least potentially, wholly and entirely false). In addition to this your stated grasp of the ontology and theology of the christian god is plainly mistaken. I'm telling you this as an out and out anti-theist and gnostic atheist.
Because of both of these things, your argument is unconvincing (and I'm telling you -this- as a person who..ultimately, agrees with your conclusion). The assertions are flawed, and their truth would be incapable of leading to the stated end. No amount of reassertion will repair the first defect, and no amount of repair would be able to overcome the second defect.
The key turn of your argument is a failure regardless of whether or not your assertions could be made true, and regardless of your certainty in their truth as-is, and regardless of whether or not you managed to happen upon an accurate conclusion by accident. None of your thoughts on double nihilation will matter unless there is a demonstrable unfamiliarity with their thrust on the part of Great Fairy. The trouble, is that magic book explicitly contends otherwise.
Ultimately, we're left wondering -why- a god would do what he knew wasn't going to work, but it's the second part of that more accurate objection that completely diffuses your argument.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
