RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 8:12 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2018 at 8:20 pm by negatio.)
(September 11, 2018 at 4:25 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote:(September 11, 2018 at 9:45 am)negatio Wrote: Bullshit, I am never intentionally dishonest.Bullshit, it is your dishonest intransigent crappy attitude that has you where you are right now.
(September 11, 2018 at 9:45 am)negatio Wrote: I am completely authentic, and, that authenticity is a part of what pisses you off. It does not matter when we exchanged private mails, we did exchange mails.How many after I washed my hands of your authentic bullshit?
(September 11, 2018 at 9:45 am)negatio Wrote: All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against your own damned fucking inefficacious law, and, collectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake ! Negatio.Try reading the rules for comprehension.
(September 11, 2018 at 7:59 pm)Losty Wrote:(September 11, 2018 at 7:23 pm)negatio Wrote: Try reading the rules for comprehension.
You’re still wrong about that rule. I don’t have to be nice to you just because you’re new. You could do as I suggested several times and create a thread in the Questions For Staff forum to ask for yourself but you won’t because you already know you’re wrong. At this point you’re just sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming “lalala I can’t hear you!” Which is incredibly immature for someone of your age and supposed education.
I am not actually incorrect about the rule being discussed, which it appears you hadn't heard of. Since there is so much difference of opinion regarding the meaning of the rule, an arbitrator may have to ultimately decide. Insulting me now is in poor taste while you are in your evening cups. I still want to write you that essay on crakers...Negatio
