Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 26, 2024, 3:44 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 9:45 am)negatio Wrote:
(September 11, 2018 at 7:42 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: And now you are being intentionally dishonest. We have exchanged no private messages since the point at which I washed my hands of you. This will continue to be the case. You not only burned the bridges, you drained the river afterwards just out of obtuseness.


Bullshit, I am never intentionally dishonest.
Bullshit, it is your dishonest intransigent crappy attitude that has you where you are right now.

(September 11, 2018 at 9:45 am)negatio Wrote: I am completely authentic, and, that authenticity is a part of what pisses you off.  It does not matter when we exchanged private mails, we did exchange mails.
How many after I washed my hands of your authentic bullshit?

(September 11, 2018 at 9:45 am)negatio Wrote: All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against your own damned fucking inefficacious law, and, collectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake !  Negatio.
Try reading the rules for comprehension.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
If this place has been nothing but a source of negativity for you, then why remain? There are plenty of other atheist forums and philosophy forums on the web. It's not like Tibs gets extra funding from malcontents, so you staying here isn't doing anyone a favor.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 11:12 am)negatio Wrote: I am absolutely and totally certain that members who have visited my thread are fairly well informed regarding why I am here and what I am doing here; it would be groveling to do so now, when I am  alienated by member conduct while I was a newbie, and, by the fact that Staff busted me, while they were breaking the law that newbies cannot be insulted in any location upon the forum.  Thank you. Negatio.

If you don't like this place, you can always go away. If you think you're being abused, you don't have to be a masochist about it. I hate to see you suffer.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 2:21 pm)negatio Wrote: emjay, I will have to attempt to regress into the past of my thread and find a little tiny :   here  which appears as a blue link in a reply from Kit. So while I have to figure out a polite way to reply to the radio personality person, who is approaching me via insult, with which I am overdosed , I believe it best to ignore his shit for the time being, and, in an attempt to teach myself to step aside from the good old presentation of one's self to me via insulting me,  I have, now, to fail to respond to the insult-laden query, and, thereby stay out of further problems with the inauthoritative authorities acting inauthoritatively aganist me here on the forum, and, yet ,are well able to , unethically, shame me unjustifiably;-- I best not, at this time, engage some radio dude who proceeds via insult, because, I could get supra-upset, and, take the wrong tack in a reply to some nauseating  spectacularistically-oriented horseshit or other.
If we could ever get back to shiggles via Platonic dialogical dialectic, he could, if  he has the brains and the ability to go up against someone who has essentially, via reason, prevailed in all engagements with Jormungandr , Abaddon-Ire, Vulcanlogician, and others,  join in on a future dialogic, but, until we resolve my anger over being punished by corrupt and inauthoritative authority, the radio personality will not, ever, have a chance to rattle my cage dialogically.  Negatio

bold mine

I haven't seen you prevail in the least. If you change prevail to evade, side step or dodge then I'd agree.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 6:33 pm)I’m mh.brewer Wrote: I haven't seen you prevail in the least. If you change prevail to evade, side step or dodge then I'd agree.



[Image: bbb59Ce.gif]

(September 17, 2015 at 4:04 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I make change in the coin tendered. If you want courteous treatment, behave courteously. Preaching at me and calling me immoral is not courteous behavior.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 4:38 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: If this place has been nothing but a source of negativity for you, then why remain?  There are plenty of other atheist forums and philosophy forums on the web.  It's not like Tibs gets extra funding from malcontents, so you staying here isn't doing anyone a favor.



Kevin, Like I said, I thought you were asking why I did not join via the introductory forum and I have explained why. However your own impatience and quick-serve expectations were angered too too rapidly.  Even if I had originally understood that you wished me to post in  introductory portion of the forum, it would never have happened, for as Vulcanlogician said, I am not a groveler, after the shit treatment I have undergone for three weeks.  So sorry you got so damned mad! Shit.  If it wasn't for your help we would not have just won-out on the question of member/staff insult outside the newbies portion of the forum. Thank you so much for that, it was powerful, and, demonstrates staff does not know the very law they so clumsily attempt to enforce.  I think it was you to whom I sent an account of why I am here.  I stay now for the sake of encountering sessions like I was fortunate enough to experience with Vulcanlogician, however, now, I believe he is less upset about this thread not so much because of me, rather, it is probably on account of the atmosphere the thread exhibits on account of the ongoing employment against me of a methodology of insult. The insult will very possibly stop now, since, on account of Kit and you, the rule of law is now very clear.


I don't know, if media types were starting to upsurge here, would you leave ? I wouldn't.  Negatio.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Even if the section you quoted were a rule, it only says that members are not free to insult others without limit. But then, that's already been pointed out in the rules on flaming, as well as the prime directive. It's simply underscoring that there are limits on behavior, without actually setting any new limits. What it does not do is create a new rule whereby members are required to treat new members in any way differently than other members outside the introduction forum. Nobody has ever had carte blanche to be insulting or rude outside the introduction forum. It only requests that people try to be welcoming and friendly at all times. It does not say we are obligated to do so, nor that failure to do so will be punished.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 9:45 am)negatio Wrote: All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against your own damned fucking inefficacious law, and, collectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake !  Negatio.
Try reading the rules for comprehension.


 
So far, I've read one, perhaps two, rules. Both beautifully written and beautifully intended. Did any of the members know of the non-insult statute extant on this Forum ?  Clearly not ! (You are incorrect about cramming exclamation and question marks directly into the end of a sentence, that was an intentional attempt of yours to mislead me, and, it worked for a little while).
I do not particularly believe in rules, for I know there is more humane and more efficient means to men conducting themselves civilly among one another than, via rules ! Did the rule
against insulting newbies work in the instance now in question ? No. And, the reason is not that staff and members had never heard of the particular law; it is rather, because so-called law is not, in fact, an efficacy among men.  It will be interesting to see how Losty and her co-horts, (Losty has, in past, been a tremendous help to me), manage the situation into which they are now thrown, regarding their own conduct, their own misconduct, the insult statute, and insulting persons like yourself, however, in your particular case, it is not insult, it is ire !  Negatiol.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
You'll be really frustrated, with no one to vent to, when the banhammer inevitably falls, lol.

Don't get me wrong. I'm rooting for you. I hope you make it passed this and join other luminaries of your kind here on the boards.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
[Image: giphy.gif]
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 11315 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 3354 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 3214 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 2864 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 5763 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 31916 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 5186 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 6274 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Plantiga's ontological argument. Mystic 31 8191 April 25, 2013 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: A_Nony_Mouse
  Why ontological arguments are illogical liam 51 28656 August 14, 2012 at 8:06 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)