(September 29, 2018 at 12:12 pm)alpha male Wrote:(September 29, 2018 at 11:48 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: We have the witnesses in this case and can examine them. We don't in the case of your Lord. If you're trying to say that we have no credible evidence for the stories about Jesus, I think you're right.
LOL - it's the same when you want, different when you want.
And for the umpteenth time, we've already gotten testimony from the other witnesses, and they all deny that it happened, or at best can't recall it.
Mark Judge didn't provide testimony because he wasn't there to do so. Neither were any other witnesses present to offer testimony. You know this. So quit trying to move your fucking goal posts. Mark Judge didn't give anything but a very weak, six sentence letter (NOT performed UNDER OATH) which hardly speaks for his credibility. Get him in front of people who can ask him questions. Give him a polygraph test. Have him SWEAR to tell the truth. That's called testimony.
Anyone can write something and include a statement of "under penalty of perjury" and then sign it. But when you swear under oath, in a hearing, you are actually providing testimony.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
