At work.
I've actually had a chat (Admittedly very breif) with a fellow worker of the faith that the OP is presenting about the Halal thing.
Though the conversation was more on the ethical method OF slaughter and not about the theological essence in regards TO slaughter.
The outcome being that we agreed about when it came to the dispatching of said critter THEN the system which was shown to be the quickest, least possibly painful method (Short of becoming a complete vegitarian) should be ths better/preffered method.
Now, since we also both agreed that near instantanious destruction of any animal's grey matter (Leaving aside conversations with Little Rik for the moment) does, indeed mean that it is therefore impossible for said animal to experience anything.
We both agreed that modern farming practices (Such as participated in by countries such as, say Australia, Brittain etc) would, indeed, produce such humane treatment of animals when it came to them being rendered inert.
Basically the other fellow agreed that the 'Halal' method (As they presented it) was less humane than pneumatic bolt instantly driven through an animals cranium.
Though I am unsure if the OP is making any comkents about the welfare of tye subject matter in regards to the Halal issue?
Cheers.
I've actually had a chat (Admittedly very breif) with a fellow worker of the faith that the OP is presenting about the Halal thing.
Though the conversation was more on the ethical method OF slaughter and not about the theological essence in regards TO slaughter.
The outcome being that we agreed about when it came to the dispatching of said critter THEN the system which was shown to be the quickest, least possibly painful method (Short of becoming a complete vegitarian) should be ths better/preffered method.
Now, since we also both agreed that near instantanious destruction of any animal's grey matter (Leaving aside conversations with Little Rik for the moment) does, indeed mean that it is therefore impossible for said animal to experience anything.
We both agreed that modern farming practices (Such as participated in by countries such as, say Australia, Brittain etc) would, indeed, produce such humane treatment of animals when it came to them being rendered inert.
Basically the other fellow agreed that the 'Halal' method (As they presented it) was less humane than pneumatic bolt instantly driven through an animals cranium.
Though I am unsure if the OP is making any comkents about the welfare of tye subject matter in regards to the Halal issue?
Cheers.
