(October 8, 2018 at 9:19 am)Rahn127 Wrote:(October 8, 2018 at 8:42 am)SteveII Wrote: That's a very foolish statement and shows that you have no idea what you are talking about and aren't/incapable of grasping the actual moving parts of a philosophical discussion. But thanks for the reply--I like to know where the atheists all fit on the discussion-fitness scale.
My "foolish" statement doesn't make it false.
You believe Jesus was a real person.
I believe the character in the story book was a fictional representation of several different stories.
What "story book" are you referring to? If you mean the NT, then you just proved that you have no clue what you are rambling on about.
Quote:Supernatural stories have no basis in reality.
That's hardcore question begging (a fallacy by the way) in just 7 words--you are efficient!
Quote:It's not worth my time to comment on everyone of your attempts at making some kind of sense from a fictional story book.
You started this thread. Did you do that just to hear how smart you are? See some of your deep thoughts up there on the internet?
Quote:By the way, Mathew, Mark, Luke & John were not written by Mathew, Mark, Luke & John. Those names were made up. The authors are unknown.
Well, Luke did write Luke and Acts--so there is a glaring mistake in you simplistic argument.
We aren't certain who the editors of the other three gospels were. Tell me, do you think the originals were just left on someone's doorstep and the first century church--which was already going for a few decades said: "hey, look what I found! Cool story--let's name if Mark!".
Quote:Your attempts at rational thought are as spammy as that wall of incoherent text.
I'm certain that this discussion is quickly moving beyond your abilities to keep up your end of it. But, we'll see. Got any more question-begging assertions and mischaracterizations I can correct for you?
