(October 8, 2018 at 11:49 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Peebo, I'm not asserting that theists can't be computer scientists, rather that MK, who is currently in school taking courses that require a firm grasp of logic, fails miserably in that regard where his religion is concerned. Specifically with his notion of proof, which has consistently been a layer cake of fallacies, word salad, and bare assertions. His misuse/misunderstanding of the word is nearing Vizzini levels. Which is baffling to me since he presumably has some understanding of what a proof is based on his academic work.
MK had a bit of a crisis of conscience a few years ago when looking at the evidence lead him to disbelief. He was pretty much atheist for two weeks, disappeared for a while and then came back the fanatic he is now.
He used be quite a valuable poster on here, willing to accept doubt and contrasting viewpoints. What he has become is a great loss.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home