Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?

[Amarok]

Sorry, once you say "every one of them is an unsubstantiated allegation" you have made a positive claim and you need to provide some evidence. All we seem to have is my documents, historical evidence, logical deductions and inferences verses your assertions that they are not what they claim to be. Congrats on the misstep. Question is, can you back up your claim? Or, do you want to modify your position to something like "I am not convinced by your evidence"--which gives you what you want--no burden of proof.

Nope it's not a positive claim it's a negative one .This burden shifting will not save you .

---

Sorry, once you say "every one of them is an unsubstantiated allegation" you have made a positive claim and you need to provide some evidence. All we seem to have is my documents, historical evidence, logical deductions and inferences verses your assertions that they are not what they claim to be. Congrats on the misstep. Question is, can you back up your claim? Or, do you want to modify your position to something like "I am not convinced by your evidence"--which gives you what you want--no burden of proof.

No, I don't, Steve. You have provided no proof that any of your statements is true. That's a self-evident fact, which I have pointed out. Your "logical" deductions begin with unsubstantiated CLAIMS. Ergo, your entire argument falls apart like a house of cards. Your CLAIMS are not convincing or valid because you have not backed them up with historical evidence. Again, you are dishonestly attempting to reverse the burden of proof.

He will keep badgering you unfortunately