RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
October 9, 2018 at 11:48 am
(This post was last modified: October 9, 2018 at 11:53 am by Amarok.)
(October 9, 2018 at 11:32 am)Grandizer Wrote:He does not get it nor does he wish too .He simply wants to repeat his apologist script and pretend he's won .(October 9, 2018 at 11:29 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: If your math leads to logical contradictions, then I think that you need to re-examine your math. But it's not really about math, but assumptions that haven't been properly thought through.
You are an idiot. Just as 0/0 = indeterminate is not a logical contradiction, it's the same with infinity - infinity.
Not surprised you still don't get it.
(October 9, 2018 at 11:47 am)Grandizer Wrote:One among many reasons the ontological argument is regarded as rubbish can't wait till we wind up going over his math vs metaphysics bullocks .(October 9, 2018 at 11:42 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Fixed it for you. Now what information do we actually gain from your statement?
It's his pretext to argue for his pet god's existence in all possible worlds if he exists in even one of them. The problem is that the modal ontological argument still doesn't effectively show that his pet god possibly exists, only that it must exist if it is possible for it to exist. It's only "compelling" to people who already accept this nonsense.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb