Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?

[Deesse23]

The whole quantum thingie is basically the nail in the coffin of all those who try to argue or define their pet god into existence based on the "classic" view on reality as we know it since man was able to think, although it seems to be so intuitive and tempting to use arguments based on such a view.

Once they understand that the fundamental nature of reality (on a very small scale) revolves around waves of probabilities and them collapsing into actual reality when under observation (and we yet even arent sure how to interpret all of this, Kopenhagen is just one interpretation), its game over, and no classic philosopher  will get you back into the game. Once again i find it fascinating and ironic that nature seems to be more "strange" than humans can possibly imagine, now or 3000y ago, and i wouldnt like to bet my € on the next 3000.

All fools like RR79 or Steve can do, is borrow from what science discovers and adapt their silly word games and re-define their pet gods accordingly to either fit them into remaining gaps or put them in line with what we already knew.


Edit:
The big difference between those great minds who were involved in QM (relativity too) in the early 20th century on one hand and dishonest and ignorant fools is: When they calculated and observed and finally had to conclude that either they were wrong or that their view on reality was fundamentally flawed, they decided to adapt their view on reality, no matter how absurd it seemed to be. Evidence trumps intuition and conjecture.